Scoliosis Correction
We use a Berry Translation Table in conjunction with mirror image
adjustments and mirror image exercises to naturally correct some types of
thoraco-lumbar scoliosis curves. This table is the most comfortable and one
of the most effective tables used for scoliosis correction. Traction times
typically last 10 to 27-minutes for maximal correction. Most of our patients
will read a book or take a nap while tractioning. We have had significant
scoliosis corrections using this table in conjunction with Mirror-Image
Adjustments and Mirror-Image Exercises.
Clinical Research
Radiographic Pseudoscoliosis in Healthy Male Subjects Following Voluntary Lateral Translation (Side Glide) of the Thoracic Spine
Deed E. Harrison, DC, Joseph W. Betz, DC, Rene Cailliet, MD, Christopher J.
Colloca, BS, DC,
Donald D. Harrison, PhD, DC, MSE, Jason W. Haas, DC, Tadeusz J. Janik, PhD,
MSE
ABSTRACT. HarrisonDE, Betz JW, Cailliet R, Colloca CJ,
Harrison DD, Haas JW, Janik TJ. Radiographic pseudoscoliosis in
healthy male subjects following voluntary lateral translation (side
glide) of the thoracic spine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:
117-22.
Objective: To determine projected Cobb angles associated
with trunk list (side shift) posture, hypothesizing that the side
shift “scoliotic” curvature would be similar to true scoliotic
curvature in the early stages.
Design: Anteroposterior (AP) radiographs of volunteers in
neutral, in left, and right lateral translations of the thoracic cage
(trunk list) were digitized.
Setting: Computer laboratory.
Participants: Fifteen healthy male volunteers.
Interventions: Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures: Cobb and Risser-Ferguson angles
determined from digitizing vertebral body corners from
T12 to L5 on 51 AP lumbar radiographs.
Results: Using the horizontal displacement of T12 from S1,
subjects could translate an average of 54.0mm to the left and
52.5mm to the right. The average digitized Cobb T12-L5 angle
produced for the 30 translated postures was 16°. Angles ranged
from 2.6° to 27.0°. Risser-Ferguson angles averaged 10° between
T12 and L5. Statistical correlations were found between
Cobb L1-5 and translation to the left (P.015), Cobb T12-L5
and translation to the right (P.024), Risser-Ferguson angle
and translation to the left (P.021), and the lumbosacral angle
to the right and trunk translation to the right (P.027).
Conclusions: During lateral translation of the thorax (trunk
list), coupled lumbar lateral flexion resulted in the appearance
of a pseudoscoliosis on AP radiographs. For this trunk list
posture, Cobb angles are considerable (16°) and increase as the
magnitude of trunk translation increases. Differentiating true
structural scoliosis from this pseudoscoliosis would be clinically
important. The small coupled axial rotation in trunk list is
in contrast to the considerable degree of axial rotation observed
in structural idiopathic scoliosis.
Clinical Research
Evaluation of the assumptions used to derive an ideal normal cervical spine
model.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of anatomical assumptions made to
derive a geometrical, ideal, normal model of the upright, static, sagittal
cervical spine, to make comparisons with other spinal models and to discuss
the implications of a normal cervical model. STUDY DESIGN: (a) Data were
collected from 400 lordotic lateral cervical radiographs and compared with
the predictions of a geometric normal cervical lordotic model. Angels of
intersecting tangent lines, drawn at posterior vertebral body margins, were
measured at each disc space and between C2 and C7. Height-to-length ratios
and an anterior weight-bearing distance were measured. (b) Literature
reviews were obtained through Medline and Chirolars. RESULTS: Modeling: the
400 sample subjects varied from the geometric model by approximately 5%.
CONCLUSIONS: Two typical geometric configurations of the cervical spine were
identified as a normal circular lordotic arc of 34 degrees and an ideal
normal of 42 degrees. Literature reviewed establishes cervical lordosis as a
desirable clinical outcome of care. Harrison DD, Janik TJ, Troyanovich SJ,
HarrisonDE, Colloca CJ. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997 May;20(4):246-56.